Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorDahooie, Jalil Heidary
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, Navid
dc.contributor.authorMohammadi, Mehdi
dc.contributor.authorShahmohammadi, Parisa
dc.contributor.authorTurkis, Zenonas
dc.contributor.authorŠaparauskas, Jonas
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-24T06:26:38Z
dc.date.available2019-10-24T06:26:38Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationE+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2019, roč. 22, č. 3, s. 100-120.cs
dc.identifier.issn1212-3609 (Print)
dc.identifier.issn2336-5604 (Online)
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/35656
dc.format21 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/odt
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTechnická univerzita v Libercics
dc.rightsCC BY-NC 4.0en
dc.subjectoceňování patentůcs
dc.subjectnanotechnologiecs
dc.subjectrozhodování o více atributechcs
dc.subjectstepwise weight assessment ratio analysiscs
dc.subjectadditive ratio assessmentcs
dc.titleA framework for valuation and prioritization of patents using a combined madm approach. Case study: nanotechnologyen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedPatent valuation and prioritization is one of the main activities for the management of intellectual property assets in an organization. So far, numerous attempts have been made to determine the value of patents, some of which have not been efficient due to ignoring some effective dimensions or considering the same importance for all aspects. To overcome this challenge, this research aims to provide a framework for valuing and prioritizing patents using a combination of MADM methods. For this purpose, first, the indicators for patent valuation and prioritization were taken from the literature and aggregated and finalized based on opinions of experts of technology management as well as nanotechnology in the form of a Delphi method. Second, the indicators were weighted, and their importance specified based on expert opinions using the questionnaire tool and stepwise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) method. Third, the additive ratio assessment (ARAS) method was used to value and prioritize the patents. For this reason, 12 nanotechnology patents, registered in 2016 at the Iranian Administration of Registration of Documents, were valued and ultimately prioritized. The results from the criteria weights indicate that commercial and market potential and the economic value should be selected as the most critical dimensions. Also, among the indicators, the project investment cost, the costs of production and commercialization and the economic relevance, were selected as the most critical indicators. Among the 12 patents examined, “Gelatin-Chitosan/Carbon Nanotube Composite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications” was identified as the most valuable patent.en
dc.subject.translatedpatent valuationen
dc.subject.translatednanotechnologyen
dc.subject.translatedmulti-attribute decision-makingen
dc.subject.translatedSWARAen
dc.subject.translatedARASen
dc.identifier.doihttps://dx.doi.org/10.15240/tul/001/2019-3-007
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 3 (2019)
Číslo 3 (2019)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
Dahooie.pdfPlný text848,06 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/35656

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. Ekonomie a management
  5. 2019
  6. Číslo 3 (2019)