Název: Chesterton jako prorok vědy?
Autoři: Lukavec, Jan
Citace zdrojového dokumentu: Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni. 2009, č. 2, s. 43-53.
Datum vydání: 2009
Nakladatel: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
Typ dokumentu: article
URI: http://ff.zcu.cz/files/Acta-FF/2009/ACTA_FF_2009_2.pdf
ISSN: 1802-0364
Klíčová slova: literatura;věda;Gilberth Keith Chesterton
Klíčová slova v dalším jazyce: literature;science;Gilberth Keith Chesterton
Abstrakt: In my book about Chesterton (Fanatic, prophet or clown? G.K. Chesterton and his exponents) I distinguished three contradictory aspects of Chesterton´s work: polysemiotics versus ideological monosemiotics, movement towards negation of reality and order versus movement towards affirmation of reality and order, anthropological particularism versus universalism. This is why Chesterton could be understood as a conservative as well as a revolutionary, as a defender of universal human rights as well as a chauvinist, as a specialist in semiotics and heterogeneous interpretations as well as an ideologue constantly reiterating the same statement. Also in Chesterton´s relation towards science we can find ambiguous attitudes, for example towards supernatural phenomena. In most of his works, miracles really take place. Chesterton perceived openness to miracles as a sign of wisdom, but in his Father Brown stories, the main hero solves all the crimes simply with the help of his common sense, the belief in miracles being characteristic of superstitious materialists and charlatans. This and other paradoxes are also reflected in Chesterton´s reception among the Czech scientific community. Astronomer Jiří Grygar, a leading representative of Sisyfos, the Czech Sceptics‘ Club, understands Chesterton as somebody who perfectly discriminates between faith and superstition, and between science and pseudoscience. On the other hand, biologist A. Markoš and geologist V. Cílek, disciples of the Czech philosopher and biologist Z. Neubauer, regard Chesterton as a great opponent of scientism, the Sisyfos Club being a paradigm of this approach.
Práva: © Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 2 (2009)
Číslo 2 (2009)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
Lukavec.pdfPlný text159,43 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít

Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/6512

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.