Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorSuchánek, Drahomír
dc.contributor.editorNovotný, Lukáš
dc.contributor.editorClemens, Gabriele
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-08T07:14:54Z
dc.date.available2021-01-08T07:14:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationWest Bohemian Historical Review. 2020, no. 2, p. 143-166.en
dc.identifier.urihttp://wbhr.cz/images/issues/WBHR_2020_2.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/42363
dc.description.sponsorshipPROGRES program Q09: History – The Key to Understanding the Globalized Worlden
dc.format24 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherZápadočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWest Bohemian Historical Reviewen
dc.rights© Západočeská univerzita v Plznics
dc.subjectGregoriánské papežstvícs
dc.subjectPapežské volbycs
dc.subjectkardinálcs
dc.subjectNicholas IIcs
dc.subjectStephen IXcs
dc.subjectIn nomine Dominics
dc.subjectJindřich IVcs
dc.subjectPeter Damiancs
dc.titlePapal Elections on the Eve of Issuanceof the Papal Decree In nomine Domini – Historical Analysisof the Election of Popes Stephen IX and Nicholas IIen
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessopenAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedIn the context of the further history of papal elections, the importance of Nicholas II’s electoral decree is fundamental. It is at the origin of the dominant position of the College of Cardinals in the selection of the new head of the Catholic Church in a form which was enforced as binding. This study considers the circumstances of the two papal elections – Stephen IX and Nicholas II. It is based on a conviction that an endeavour at defining the rules for the election of the head of the Catholic Church is closely linked to the specific situation at the end of the 1050s, and like many previous legislative amendments to the election process reflects major problems which the Roman Curia had to deal with. If we want to understand the significance and target of Nicholas II’s electoral decree, it is essential to analyse the situation which preceded the issuance of the decree in detail. The study therefore deals not only with the circumstances around the election of Pope Nicholas II, with whom the electoral modification is primarily linked, but also the pro-reform Stephen IX and Antipope Benedict X. This is because each proves a different approach to the desired form of securing a new pope and demonstrates a distinct concept for determining electors and an appropriate method for their establishment at the Holy See.en
dc.subject.translatedGregorian Papacyen
dc.subject.translatedPapal Electionsen
dc.subject.translatedcardinalen
dc.subject.translatedNicholas IIen
dc.subject.translatedStephen IXen
dc.subject.translatedIn nomine Dominien
dc.subject.translatedHenry IVen
dc.subject.translatedPeter Damianen
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Číslo 2 (2020)
Číslo 2 (2020)

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor Popis VelikostFormát 
Suchánek.pdfPlný text145,03 kBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/42363

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikace ZČU / UWB Publications
  3. Časopisy ZČU / UWB Journals
  4. West Bohemian Historical Review
  5. 2020
  6. Číslo 2 (2020)