Title:	Předchůdci neoklasické ekonomie
Other Titles:	Predecessors of neoclassical economics
Authors:	Sirůček, Pavel Džbánková, Zuzana
Citation:	E+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2008, č. 3, s. 23-38.
Issue Date:	2008
Publisher:	Technická univerzita v Liberci
Document type:	článek article
URI:	http://www.ekonomie-management.cz/download/1331826678_63ff/02_sirucek_dzbankova.pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11025/17238
ISSN:	1212-3609 (Print) 2336-5604 (Online)
Keywords:	neoklasická ekonomika;technický přístup;Adam Smith
Keywords in different language:	neoclassical economics;engineering access;Adam Smith
Abstract in different language:	Neoclassical theoretic-methodological system always has had many problematic locations that are currently accumulating by global acceleration. Neoclassical economics still performs dominant part or principle of modern standard economic theory. Conceptions and approaching of different kinds of neoclassical economics including the most advanced elaborations have a lot of their own historical predecessors. The Beginning of the seventieth in the nineteenth century is associated with important turning point in economical thinking development - with attack of first neoclassical world schools. Marginalism infiltrated economic sciences mainly by conception of marginal utility representing principle of neoclassical valuation and price theory. Next to sequence of some other classical school of political economy aspects there are very often reminding initiators and prede- cessors of neoclassicism and marginalistic revolution in the nineteenth century - Cournot, Thünen and Gossen. But there exists many others more or less famous and appreciated authors adumbra- ting contemporary standard models. For their deeper and critical understanding in today globaliza- tion is very important reminding of historical proportion, social-economic context and reports and ideas of „dead men“. Even ideological conditionality of economic doctrines, intellectual atmosphe- re influence on economical thinking development or class etc. interests cannot be disregarded. As well here we can commonly meet contradictory interpretations and evaluations. Well for example conceptions of A. Smith („the father of capitalism“) and other classical economists are sample not only for liberal neoclassical authors. Classic school performs also one of the primary ideological resources of Marxism. Standard neoclassical economics wants to be a positive science. In spite of that it cannot be translated like moral sterile branch. The man makes his decisions based on rationality and feelings. Human activity is determined by social and cultural surrounding that create experiences and value system. We also cannot have any regard to moral and ethic dimension and economical activity effects.
Rights:	© Technická univerzita v Liberci CC BY-NC 4.0
Appears in Collections:	Číslo 3 (2008) Číslo 3 (2008)

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.