Title: Pairwise judgments consistency impact on quality of multi-criteria group decision-making with ahp
Authors: Kazibudzki, Pawel Tadeusz
Křupka, Jiří
Citation: E+M. Ekonomie a Management = Economics and Management. 2019, roč. 22, č. 4, s. 195-212.
Issue Date: 2019
Publisher: Technická univerzita v Liberci
Document type: article
článek
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/36043
ISSN: 2336-5604 (Online)
1212-3609 (Print)
Keywords: skupinové rozhodování;proces analytické hierarchie;kvalita priorit;soudržnost soudních rozhodnutí
Keywords in different language: group decision making;analytic hierarchy process;prioritization quality;pairwise judgments consistency
Abstract in different language: Presumably complex systems can be better understood when they are broken down into their constituent elements and structured hierarchically. Then, judgments about these elements can be synthesized on the basis of their relative importance at each level of the hierarchy into a set of overall priorities. By breaking down a reality into homogenous clusters and subdividing them into smaller ones, it is possible to integrate large amounts of information into the structure of a problém and form a more comprehensive picture of the whole system. There is a decision support methodology (DSM) which conforms to the above prescription. It is called the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and was devised at the Wharton School of Business by Thomas Saaty (1980). Its contemporary applications can be found, for example in Lidinska and Jablonsky (2018), Abdelmaguid and Elrashidy (2016), Kramulová and Jablonský (2016), and Ponis et al. (2015).
Rights: CC BY-NC 4.0
Appears in Collections:Číslo 4 (2019)
Číslo 4 (2019)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Kazibudzki.pdfPlný text1,37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/36043

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.