Full metadata record
DC poleHodnotaJazyk
dc.contributor.authorGaleta, Patrik
dc.contributor.authorGaletová, Martina
dc.contributor.authorSablin, Mikhail
dc.contributor.authorGermonpré, Mietje
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-27T11:00:22Z-
dc.date.available2023-02-27T11:00:22Z-
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.citationGALETA, P. GALETOVÁ, M. SABLIN, M. GERMONPRÉ, M. Morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021). Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 2022, roč. 305, č. 12, s. 3422-3429. ISSN: 1932-8486cs
dc.identifier.issn1932-8486
dc.identifier.uri2-s2.0-85128846264
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11025/51600
dc.format8 s.cs
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAnatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biologyen
dc.rightsPlný text je přístupný v rámci univerzity přihlášeným uživatelům.cs
dc.rights© American Association for Anatomyen
dc.titleMorphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021)en
dc.typečlánekcs
dc.typearticleen
dc.rights.accessrestrictedAccessen
dc.type.versionpublishedVersionen
dc.description.abstract-translatedJanssens et al. (2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24624) recently commented on our article (Galeta et al., 2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24500) regarding the morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dog and Pleistocene wolf crania. The authors argued that these differences reflect the normal population variation of wolves, that some of the cranial measurements used do not reflect morphological changes during domestication. In this commentary, we briefly address the issue of within and between morpho-population variability. The results based on our canid sample suggest that the magnitude of morphological differences between distinct morpho-populations (i.e., recent northern dogs and wolves) is at least twice as large as that observed within morpho-populations (between two groups of recent northern wolves segregated by cluster analysis). The morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves are relatively large, which may indicate that they did not likely represent a single Late Pleistocene morpho-population. Although the sample size was small, the randomization analysis published in 2021 confirmed that the unbalanced composition of the reference sample did not affect the reliability of the morphological segregation of putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves.en
dc.subject.translatedMorphologicalen
dc.subject.translateddifferencesen
dc.subject.translatedputative Paleolithicen
dc.subject.translateddogsen
dc.subject.translatedwolvesen
dc.subject.translatedcommentaryen
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/ar.24935
dc.type.statusPeer-revieweden
dc.identifier.document-number787530200001
dc.identifier.obd43937657
dc.project.IDEE2.3.30.0038/Nová excelence lidských zdrojůcs
Vyskytuje se v kolekcích:Články / Articles (KSA)
OBD

Soubory připojené k záznamu:
Soubor VelikostFormát 
Galeta et al. 2022 Commentary.pdf1,35 MBAdobe PDFZobrazit/otevřít  Vyžádat kopii
Zobrazit minimální záznam Zobrazit statistiky


Použijte tento identifikátor k citaci nebo jako odkaz na tento záznam: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/51600

Všechny záznamy v DSpace jsou chráněny autorskými právy, všechna práva vyhrazena.

hledání
navigace
  1. DSpace at University of West Bohemia
  2. Publikační činnost / Publications
  3. OBD