Title: | Morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021) |
Authors: | Galeta, Patrik Galetová, Martina Sablin, Mikhail Germonpré, Mietje |
Citation: | GALETA, P. GALETOVÁ, M. SABLIN, M. GERMONPRÉ, M. Morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and wolves: A commentary to Janssens et al. (2021). Anatomical Record-Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 2022, roč. 305, č. 12, s. 3422-3429. ISSN: 1932-8486 |
Issue Date: | 2022 |
Publisher: | Wiley |
Document type: | článek article |
URI: | 2-s2.0-85128846264 http://hdl.handle.net/11025/51600 |
ISSN: | 1932-8486 |
Keywords in different language: | Morphological;differences;putative Paleolithic;dogs;wolves;commentary |
Abstract in different language: | Janssens et al. (2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24624) recently commented on our article (Galeta et al., 2021, doi: 10.1002/ar.24500) regarding the morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dog and Pleistocene wolf crania. The authors argued that these differences reflect the normal population variation of wolves, that some of the cranial measurements used do not reflect morphological changes during domestication. In this commentary, we briefly address the issue of within and between morpho-population variability. The results based on our canid sample suggest that the magnitude of morphological differences between distinct morpho-populations (i.e., recent northern dogs and wolves) is at least twice as large as that observed within morpho-populations (between two groups of recent northern wolves segregated by cluster analysis). The morphological differences between putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves are relatively large, which may indicate that they did not likely represent a single Late Pleistocene morpho-population. Although the sample size was small, the randomization analysis published in 2021 confirmed that the unbalanced composition of the reference sample did not affect the reliability of the morphological segregation of putative Paleolithic dogs and Pleistocene wolves. |
Rights: | Plný text je přístupný v rámci univerzity přihlášeným uživatelům. © American Association for Anatomy |
Appears in Collections: | Články / Articles (KSA) OBD |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
Galeta et al. 2022 Commentary.pdf | 1,35 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/11025/51600
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.