Title: Proč Aristotelés neuvádí Anaximandra z Mílétu v I. knize Metafyziky?
Authors: Kočandrle, Radim
Citation: Acta Fakulty filozofické Západočeské univerzity v Plzni. 2011, č. 2, s. 118-133.
Issue Date: 2011
Publisher: Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
Document type: article
článek
URI: http://ff.zcu.cz/files/Acta-FF/2011/ACTA_FF_2011_2.pdf
http://hdl.handle.net/11025/6347
ISSN: 1802-0364
Keywords: Anaximandros;Aristotelés;monismus;pluralismus;Theofrastos
Keywords in different language: Anaximander;Aristotle;monism;pluralism;Theofrastos
Abstract: Aristotle doesn’t mention Anaximander of Miletus in his rewiew of the predecessors in Metaphysics A. This study aims to show that Aristotle and Theophrastus mention Anaximander by name mainly in connection with Anaxagoras and Empedocles within the context of the coming-to-be. For them the Anaximander’s principle was similar to the mixture of Anaxagoras, which can be described as the one and manifold. Therefore, we may suppose that Anaximander is not mentioned explicitly because Aristotle regarded Anaxagoras to be more significant representant of the doctrine of coming-to-be as separation off of the opposites. The other reason might be the indefinity of Anaximander’s principle. However, the intermediate element in Metaphysics A might be interpreted as the Anaximander’s principle.
Rights: © Západočeská univerzita v Plzni
Appears in Collections:Číslo 2 (2011)
Články / Articles (KFI)
Číslo 2 (2011)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
kocandrle.pdfPlný text216,2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/11025/6347

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.